<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Arno# - The cutting edge of developer waffle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidarno.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidarno.org</link>
	<description>Some random thoughts on software development</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 05:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Grisoft join the &#8220;Lets piss everyone off&#8221; Brigade by Mike Dillamore</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarno.org/2008/06/30/grisoft-join-the-lets-piss-everyone-off-brigade/#comment-1148</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dillamore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarno.org/?p=289#comment-1148</guid>
		<description>Apparently the new SP1 for AVG 8 (now released) has an "option in custom install screen to de-select the linkscanner component".

See http://freeforum.avg.com/read.php?14,133954,backpage=,sv=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently the new SP1 for AVG 8 (now released) has an &#8220;option in custom install screen to de-select the linkscanner component&#8221;.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://freeforum.avg.com/read.php?14,133954,backpage=,sv=" rel="nofollow">http://freeforum.avg.com/read.php?14,133954,backpage=,sv=</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to remove Windows Desktop Search by Vadoren3</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarno.org/2007/10/26/how-to-remove-windows-desktop-search/#comment-1147</link>
		<dc:creator>Vadoren3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarno.org/2007/10/26/how-to-remove-windows-desktop-search/#comment-1147</guid>
		<description>To uninstall MS Desktop Search... Go to: C:\Windows\$NtUninstallKB917013\spuninst, open the uninstall file (xxx.exe).  Easy and quick...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To uninstall MS Desktop Search&#8230; Go to: C:\Windows\$NtUninstallKB917013\spuninst, open the uninstall file (xxx.exe).  Easy and quick&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Grisoft join the &#8220;Lets piss everyone off&#8221; Brigade by Mike Dillamore</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarno.org/2008/06/30/grisoft-join-the-lets-piss-everyone-off-brigade/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Dillamore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarno.org/?p=289#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>Fully agree.  Furthermore, AVG 8 seems to degrade performance on many systems in ways that earlier versions didn't.  Definitely time for a change - current favourite seems to be Avast, which friends speak highly of: - http://www.avast.com/eng/download-avast-home.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fully agree.  Furthermore, AVG 8 seems to degrade performance on many systems in ways that earlier versions didn&#8217;t.  Definitely time for a change - current favourite seems to be Avast, which friends speak highly of: - <a href="http://www.avast.com/eng/download-avast-home.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.avast.com/eng/download-avast-home.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to remove Windows Desktop Search by ersin</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarno.org/2007/10/26/how-to-remove-windows-desktop-search/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator>ersin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarno.org/2007/10/26/how-to-remove-windows-desktop-search/#comment-1145</guid>
		<description>thank you so much..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you so much..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to remove Windows Desktop Search by takiss</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarno.org/2007/10/26/how-to-remove-windows-desktop-search/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>takiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarno.org/2007/10/26/how-to-remove-windows-desktop-search/#comment-1143</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much, this worked perfectly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much, this worked perfectly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to remove Windows Desktop Search by Margold</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarno.org/2007/10/26/how-to-remove-windows-desktop-search/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Margold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarno.org/2007/10/26/how-to-remove-windows-desktop-search/#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>Step 3 worked perfectly - thanks so much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Step 3 worked perfectly - thanks so much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to remove Windows Desktop Search by Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarno.org/2007/10/26/how-to-remove-windows-desktop-search/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarno.org/2007/10/26/how-to-remove-windows-desktop-search/#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>Thank you! It worked! I hate stupid WDS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you! It worked! I hate stupid WDS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox 3 Dayload Day is to happen after all (just 19 hours late) by You can call me boss...</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarno.org/2008/06/17/firefox-3-dayload-day-is-to-happen-after-all-just-19-hours-late/#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator>You can call me boss...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarno.org/?p=286#comment-1138</guid>
		<description>Bit presumptious on that download URL, David! Excludes everyone with a decent operating system...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bit presumptious on that download URL, David! Excludes everyone with a decent operating system&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Parallel.For quirk can leave your code running sequentially by David Arno</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarno.org/2007/12/18/parallelfor-quirk-can-leave-your-code-running-sequentially/#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator>David Arno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarno.org/2007/12/18/parallelfor-quirk-can-leave-your-code-running-sequentially/#comment-1137</guid>
		<description>Dreea,

Have you tried the &lt;a href="http://www.davidarno.org/277" rel="nofollow"&gt;June CTP&lt;/a&gt; yet? Does it make a difference to what you are doing? I haven't tried it yet myself to see if there is a performance gain, so would be interested to know of others' experiences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dreea,</p>
<p>Have you tried the <a href="http://www.davidarno.org/277" rel="nofollow">June CTP</a> yet? Does it make a difference to what you are doing? I haven&#8217;t tried it yet myself to see if there is a performance gain, so would be interested to know of others&#8217; experiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Parallel.For quirk can leave your code running sequentially by Dreea</title>
		<link>http://www.davidarno.org/2007/12/18/parallelfor-quirk-can-leave-your-code-running-sequentially/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidarno.org/2007/12/18/parallelfor-quirk-can-leave-your-code-running-sequentially/#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>Well, I replace Parallel.For with Parallel.Do and it seems like a different thread is being used for each method call .
As for the parallel processing time it's better than the sequential time, but only after the parrallel.do/for are already called once(first time -&#62; bad time, all the next times-&#62; expected time). I guess this is due to a one-time start-up cost on first usage.
Thanks for replies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I replace Parallel.For with Parallel.Do and it seems like a different thread is being used for each method call .<br />
As for the parallel processing time it&#8217;s better than the sequential time, but only after the parrallel.do/for are already called once(first time -&gt; bad time, all the next times-&gt; expected time). I guess this is due to a one-time start-up cost on first usage.<br />
Thanks for replies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
